Undoubtedly, Shlumberger had a more prosperous year and generated significantly higher revenue compared to HAL. However, the stock of Shlumberger is almost twice as costly as HAL's. HAL seems like a stock with potential for growth, but it is also more prone to fluctuations in value. The question then arises, should one opt for the safer choice of investing in Schlumberger or take a chance with HAL, while buying a larger volume of shares?
There are no replies in this thread yet. Be the first to post a reply below: